|
|
Post by Horst on Jul 2, 2010 19:11:41 GMT -5
Can't very well criticize other's missions without posting one of my own, can I? Here's a 40k version of tic-tac-toe. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Krusty (zack) on Jul 3, 2010 1:22:50 GMT -5
i quite like it...
the only suggestion i have (besides a few small spelling errors) is to make it so objectives cant be placed any closer than either 6 or 12" from another one
|
|
|
|
Post by chumbalaya on Jul 3, 2010 8:13:04 GMT -5
I like. Maybe just have each objective put in the center of the square and you'd be set.
|
|
|
|
Post by Horst on Jul 3, 2010 8:14:41 GMT -5
yea, probably a good idea to just put it in the center...
|
|
Iron Warrior
Moderator 
The Iron
Iron Within! Iron Without!
Posts: 2,573
|
Post by Iron Warrior on Jul 3, 2010 12:57:50 GMT -5
You want to elaborate more on how one captures an objective.
Be in BTB? within 3" or 6"? Only certain (scoring?)units can hold it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Horst on Jul 4, 2010 15:11:29 GMT -5
I intended to make it so holding objectives was done in the normal way (troops within 3")... but was toying with the idea of fast attack being able to hold them as well, the idea being that if the purpose of holding objectives was to get a convoy through, fast scouts up front would play a part in securing the road.
|
|
|
|
Post by chumbalaya on Jul 4, 2010 16:34:10 GMT -5
Cool by me, though it would require some testing to make sure it works. Not every army has access to good non-vehicle Fast Attack  |
|
|
|
Post by jay on Jul 6, 2010 10:54:19 GMT -5
I like it. I agree with above suggestions. The only thing is we are only allowing for +3 Tactical Bonuses for this year. That is how the over points worked out. If you want to revise it and then I will get uploaded the DaBoyz GT page.
BTW we are going to have general mission FAQ. For example: you need to be within 3 inches of objective to claim it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Horst on Jul 6, 2010 11:26:08 GMT -5
i'll update it when I get home tonight, jay.
|
|
|
|
Post by Horst on Jul 6, 2010 11:30:16 GMT -5
yea... I'll update it when I get home tonight, jay. Glad you all like it, didn't think it would be TOO unbalanced, the only thing I was considering changing (other than the above suggestions about objective spacing) was the draw condition... right now I have it so that both players need 3 objectives in a row to draw... Was wondering if I should change that to either both hold 3 or both hold less than 3.
|
|
|
|
Post by hyv3mynd on Aug 18, 2010 10:08:01 GMT -5
Kevin and I playtested this last night. Not the most constructive playtest as his dice (and khorne) totally abandoned him.
Its a pretty straight forward mission with no big surprises. My only comment is I believe it will be a drawfest in a majority of games. Any other objective mission requires you to hold one more than your opponent to win. This one requires a minimum of 3 held in specific formation. It only takes one last turn tank shock in any of 3 places to prevent victory assuming you even have 3 scoring units remaining and uncontested.
|
|
