|
Post by inquisitormalice on Oct 19, 2013 10:31:06 GMT -5
You are missing Jon Willingham for both singles and doubles. I know I registered him along with Mike, Brad and me at the same time. Especially when I'm looking at the Paypal receipt.
|
|
|
Post by jay on Oct 19, 2013 21:25:04 GMT -5
inquisitormalice i sure his name is on list. I will verify. deraj I will double check the list. It wont be an issue. For the comments on the ticket sales. I not sure on fantasy, but for 40K we have almost as many as least year. The team event we have more.
|
|
|
Post by jay on Oct 28, 2013 16:06:12 GMT -5
If you are on the fence about coming it is time to get off! The last time i checked we only had 10 tickets left.
|
|
|
Post by jay on Oct 29, 2013 20:48:47 GMT -5
this is how we are going to rule condemnor boltgun issue. i hope to get it on web site tomorrow. For the condemnor boltgun we using same rules is what is in the grey knight codex and how GW FAQ it. www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m3440038a_Grey_Knights_v1.5_September_13.pdf From GW FAQ Page 55 – Condemnor Boltgun, profile *. Change to “* Any psyker taking an unsaved Wound from a stake crossbow shot[...]” So you need to hit and wound (or armor penetration) to make someone take Perils of the Warp. This needs to follow normal shooting rules, so you need to hit and wound that model to make them take a perils test. Example #1 If a sister of battle shoots with a condemnor boltgun at a tervigon can it cause 2 wounds? Yes, If the boltgun hits and wounds the tervigon then it take one wound from Perils of the warp and one from the weapon (if the tervigon fails its armour save). Example #2 If a librarian is attached to 10 man tactical squad and Sister shoots at the squad does the librarian have to take a perils test? The librarian only has to take a perils test if he/she is hit with the weapon. It has to follow normal rules for shooting. Was the librarian closest to the weapon and failed his/her look out sir role? Then yes the librarian has to take a perils and armor save from the weapon wounding him/her. If he weapon hits and wounds the squad a perils test is not needed.
|
|
|
Post by alakard2020 on Oct 29, 2013 21:28:33 GMT -5
I spoke with one of the Indy GT FAQ council members from Front-Line-Gaming and he said they would be meeting tomorrow evening to discuss and vote on the issues with the gun.
Once their ruling is published, would we still be following the Indy GT FAQ or...?
|
|
|
Post by jay on Oct 29, 2013 21:41:55 GMT -5
I will listen to see what come up with. I also reach out to couple of them to see what they say.
In our case all three judges ruled very similarly.
Since I am sister's player i was hoping for all powerful gun, but that not how i read it.
|
|
|
Post by alakard2020 on Oct 30, 2013 6:08:19 GMT -5
A few of us down here in Erie have been discussing it quite a bit, (both sisters players and non-sisters players). And our logic of thinking was:
1. GW released Codex: Grey Knights w/ the Condemnor Boltgun.
2. GW released White Dwarf Codex: Sister of Battle with the same identical Condemnor Boltgun.
3. When GW released Codex: Adepta Sororitas, the book was a lot of cutting and pasting, and if GW wanted the rule to remain the same, why go out of their way to completely re-write/re-word something that already existed unless they wanted to change it?
Because looking back, GW has updated books over the years and changed wargear in some books to improve it, and left it unchanged in older book. For example, the Storm Shield. When GW started updating the codices for 5th edition they made the Storm Shield grant an all around 3+ Invulnerable Save, leaving out Black Templars to have a 4+ Invulnerable in close combat only. Then GW went thru and updated the old books to match the new books.
So the way we've been reading it is that GW has updated/changed the gun for 6th edition. And I know I myself would be willing to bet when they update Codex: Grey Knights, we will see the same rules as the Adepta Sororitas have.
But I'd also would like to see what Front Line Gaming has to say since they've been pretty clear and precise with all their other rulings
|
|
|
Post by jay on Nov 14, 2013 23:11:40 GMT -5
Not sure will be bringing terrain to our event.
I have Chris, Aaron, Kevin, and Rob.
Is Anyone else bring a table or two to the event?
|
|
|
Post by lordnurgle on Nov 16, 2013 1:31:52 GMT -5
I'd like to bring a table or two if Bills got room in his car.
also, I signed up for doubles. It's me and Bill. I don't see us on the list for doubles. I sent the lists in already
|
|
|
Post by jay on Nov 16, 2013 21:10:42 GMT -5
Mike you are all signed up. the list is old.
|
|