Post by warmasterprimus on Oct 10, 2011 20:49:40 GMT -5
I was looking over some of the GW faqs and I remembered that Lash question that came up during Ard Boyz.
I just looked at the GW faq and they don't specifically address it (I thought that someone said it did). Anyway, I looked at INAT, and they specifically address the situation under Kharne's rule Faq. The unit doesn't move, but they can get pinned (if they aren't fearless).
I don't remember the exact circumstances, but I remember the situation being weird.
---
But that brings me to something else that may come up at the GT. Does Lash need a "to-hit" roll?
On the NO side, the codex is pretty clear about how the power goes down.
On the YES side, INAT categorized Lash as a Psychic Shoot Attack (PSA) and now days PSAs need a to-hit roll.
To me, the INAT ruling is doesn't count because they classified lash as a PSA before GW said that all PSAs now need to roll-to-hit. I think it's a release schedule issue that hasn't been cleared up. A YES ruling would be based on a FAQ, and not on a codex.
Thought I'd bring it up.
I just looked at the GW faq and they don't specifically address it (I thought that someone said it did). Anyway, I looked at INAT, and they specifically address the situation under Kharne's rule Faq. The unit doesn't move, but they can get pinned (if they aren't fearless).
I don't remember the exact circumstances, but I remember the situation being weird.
---
But that brings me to something else that may come up at the GT. Does Lash need a "to-hit" roll?
On the NO side, the codex is pretty clear about how the power goes down.
On the YES side, INAT categorized Lash as a Psychic Shoot Attack (PSA) and now days PSAs need a to-hit roll.
To me, the INAT ruling is doesn't count because they classified lash as a PSA before GW said that all PSAs now need to roll-to-hit. I think it's a release schedule issue that hasn't been cleared up. A YES ruling would be based on a FAQ, and not on a codex.
Thought I'd bring it up.