|
|
Post by johnboo on Sept 26, 2006 9:44:44 GMT -5
Where do you think average comp score will fall? I managed to type up a few high elf lists, the particularly nasty ones fall between 28-32, and yet tamer ones are around 36.
Anyone found anything similar?
|
|
|
|
Post by searsr on Sept 27, 2006 4:05:54 GMT -5
John,
Most of the HE armies that I have been playing with and creating score in the mid to low 20s. As I get closer I'll see if small tweaks will get me to around 30.
Regardless, I'll play the HE, and even if my score is 22 or whatever, I'll use a list that I like.
Also, we all know that Boldo hates elves, so he is naturally inclined to penalise them extra. ;D
Ryan
|
|
|
|
Post by johnboo on Sept 27, 2006 7:25:37 GMT -5
Interesting.
I typed up a few guick lists with beastman, DOW, and O&G. With just my typical setups the beast & DOW clocked in 28-30, but the O&G was an easy 36.
A few minor tweaks arent going to do much for the first two, but I could easily tweak my O&G up to a 40. And thats with the new O&G. None of these even took dings for magic dice or magic items. I suspect a typical dwarf list will be a 40, and I shudder to think what a rather rough Skaven list might score. I'm guessing a 40 isnt out of the range of possibility, as they dont have to worry about the cavalry, chariot, flyer, skirmisher hosers that hit most other armies.
Starting 10+ down in a tournament (basically a loss) is a pretty steep penalty .
|
|
|
|
Post by adsvampire on Sept 27, 2006 10:25:19 GMT -5
Assuming I get to go I'm planning on playing a chaos mortal army that will score around 30.
|
|
|
|
Post by deathwing on Sept 27, 2006 10:37:09 GMT -5
My O&G come up to 34. I could easily get 40 if I wanted.  |
|
